30.9.11

Martin Wolf Says: Fly the Helicopters!

Martin Wolf:
Time to think the unthinkable and start printing again/a>: I would favour the “helicopter money”, recommended by that radical economist, Milton Friedman. This would be a quasi-fiscal operation. Central bank money could pass via the government to the public at large. Alternatively, the government could fund itself from the central bank, directly. Better still, the government could increase its deficits, perhaps by slashing taxes, and taking needed funds from the central bank. Under any of these alternatives, the central bank would be behaving like any other bank, creating money in the act of lending. In current circumstances, a policy of direct financing of government by the central bank should recommend itself to monetarists and Keynesians. The former have to be worried by the fact that UK broad money (M4) shrank by 1.1 per cent in the year to July 2011. The latter would have to be pleased that governments could run still bigger deficits without increasing their debt to the public.


Some will argue that a policy of direct financing by the central bank must be inflationary. This is wrong. No automatic link exists between central bank money and the overall money supply. Above all, the policy would be inflationary only if it led to chronic excess demand. So long as the central bank retains the right to call a halt, that need be no serious danger.
A far greater threat is that a prolonged period of feeble demand would undermine supply, impoverish the country and bequeath a legacy of huge public debts. The big risk, in short, is now of a lost decade. Act now. That must not happen.
 


De Long

2 comments:

Κυριάκος said...

Έτσι έτσι βάλτε μπροστά τις μηχανές (και μετά ξυπνήσαμε).

Ο Κρούγκμαν συχνά λέει πως επαναλαμβάνονται τα λάθη του 1930 και μάλιστα ακριβώς με τις ίδιες δικαιολογίες. Μάλλον δεν είναι τυχαίο, οι ίδιοι πάνω - κάτω λόγοι ισχύουν: απληστία + ηθικολογία = συντηρητισμός + εξαθλίωση

geokalp said...

είμαστε στο 1931? σωστά?